H.R. Haldeman

General Watergate Source:
http://www.history.com/topics/watergate

Watergate Pictures:

/

H.R. Haldeman:

Harry Robbins Haldeman was born on October 27th, 1926 in Los Angeles, California. He served as the White House Chief of Staff while President Richard Nixon was in term. Haldeman is famously known for his involvement with the watergate scandal in which he was imprisoned as a result of his acts. He was tried for accounts of obstruction of justice, conspiracy, and perjury. When Haldeman was younger he joined the Naval Reserve but was denied any warfare or active combat. After he served his minimum years in the Navy he left and attended University of Redlands college and many more colleges after until he settled down at UCLA. In 1962, Haldeman ran President Nixon's campaign for governor until Nixon was elected to be our president in 1968. Nixon then chose his trusty side kick to be the Chief of Staff. In 1975 Haldeman was convicted and was sentenced to serve 18 months in Lompoc Federal Prison. He was later released from prison in 1978, and later that year he co-authored a novel called The Ends of Power. In the discussion of the book, Haldeman had used this phrase, "Bay of Pigs," which he said was a direct reference to the assassination of JFK. In his later years he began suffering many abdominal infections and soon he began rejecting the treatment which later caused his death on November 12, 1993. 

Essay #3 The Constitutional Meaning Is Changing

One formal method for integrating an amendment to the constitution is with the approbation of two thirds of both the House and the Senate. The proposed amendment must then be ratified by three fourths of the state legislature. Another method for fixing the constitution requires the supposed amendment to be voted for by two thirds of both the House and the Senate, same as afore. But the amendment must then be ratified by three fourths of state ratifying conventions. Informal methods commonly include rulings of the U.S. Supreme Court via a judicial review. This is where the Court rules on cases brought afore them predicated on today’s perception of the constitution. Brown v. Board of Inculcation in 1954 is an example. In this case, the Supreme Court overruled the precedent findings from Plessy v. Ferguson and eliminated the “separate but equal” doctrine, finding it unconstitutional. This was not a formal amendment process; however, it altered the definition of the 14th Amendment. An executive order by the President is another informal method. During wartime, the president has the potency to make decisions that transmute the construal of the Constitution. In WWII FDR’s confined all the Japanese Americans that lived in the western parts of the U.S. believing that they may be a threat to the country. This breaches the 5th Amendment, however no formal amendment was ever drafted. Informal methods are utilized more often than formal methods because they are more expeditious and more facile. The formal amendment process was designed to be lengthy and arduous to obviate dispensable and undesired alterations. It is littered with checks and balances and some formal amendment forms have historically never even been utilized. With informal methods, the regime can cut corners to expedite the process in times of need, albeit that was not what the founding fathers had pristinely envisioned.

Essay #2 Political Participation

There are quite a few different forms of political participation that can range from simply voting, to protesting. Organizing or participating in a protest is an unconventional, yet efficacious designates of political participation. If it is done correctly, it sanctions for the public as well as a desired political party to aurally perceive your concerns or opinions on a topic rather clear. Organization of a group to protest the same cause is additionally benign because it is able to depict the fortification the cause has. For example, if thousands of people amass to protest the same conception, such as the occupy wall street protests, the regime is able to visually perceive the mass amount of people that support that notion.
     In todays technological world, campaigning is facile, yet expensive. It is estimated that hundreds of millions if not billion of dollars are spent across both federal and verbalize elections. Despite cockamamy expenditures, there is mundanely a link between financial backing and victory. Fiscal donations are a great way to assure that the party or cause that you fortify or benefits you is put in potency. If a company stands to gain if a certain party is in potency, they may make an astronomically immense donation to that party to avail in their hopeful prosperity. Furthermore, through the utilization of a 501-C4, a company or individual can fortify a candidate or party anonymously.